calendar icon

September 12, 2024

4 Habits of Highly Effective Legal Research Software Buyers

By Ayomide Oluleye, CEO & Founder

Among the many tools available, legal research software stands out as an indispensable tool that can significantly influence a firm's ability to deliver exceptional client service. However, choosing the right software is not a straightforward task. You can follow the playbook of “How to Streamline Legal Research at Your Firm” to a tee, but if your firm still depends on legacy research tools that spawned the inefficient processes in the first place, your progress is likely to take longer and be less impactful. Adopting better technology is crucial because otherwise, the gains from more efficient processes are undermined by lagging tools that can’t keep pace. Selecting the right legal research software can elevate a law firm's efficiency, decision-making, and ultimately its bottom line. It requires a strategic approach that goes beyond merely considering costs or features. To make a truly effective purchase, legal professionals must develop and apply certain habits that guide them in evaluating, selecting, and integrating legal research software within their firm.

In this post, we discuss the four essential habits of highly effective legal research software buyers. These habits are designed to help law firms not only select the best tools for their needs but also ensure that these tools contribute to long-term success and client satisfaction. By adopting these habits, you can elevate your approach to legal research software purchases and maximize the value derived from your investments.

Habit 1: Value Comes First

The old saying, “you get what you pay for” sells things short. Legal research software buyers should get more value for their firms than what they pay for. Too often, decision-makers fall into the familiar confines of evaluating software primarily based on cost, believing that cheaper options will save the firm money or more expensive options deliver the value they need to raise the bar higher in pursuit of client service excellence. However, this narrow focus can lead to long-term inefficiencies, additional expenses, and missed opportunities. Highly effective buyers prioritize value over cost, understanding that a well-chosen piece of software is an investment in the firm’s future success.

The true value of legal research software lies in its ability to address specific organizational bottlenecks, meet user needs, and drive productivity. The best software solutions are those that align with the firm’s strategic goals, enhance workflow efficiency, and provide scalable solutions for future growth.

Value in the context of legal research software can be defined by three key principles: effectiveness, alignment, and scalability. By focusing on these principles, firms can evaluate software not just on its current utility but on its long-term contribution to the firm’s success.

  • Effectiveness: The software’s ability to improve the accuracy, speed, and comprehensiveness of legal research. Effective software mitigates the risk of missing out on crucial precedents and reduces the time attorneys spend searching for relevant cases, statutes, or legal precedents, allowing them to focus more on analysis and strategy.
  • Alignment: Ensuring that the software fits seamlessly into your firm’s existing processes and technology stack. This means that the software should complement, rather than disrupt, the way attorneys work.
  • Scalability: Choosing a solution that can grow with the firm. As your firm expands, its needs will evolve, and the software should be able to accommodate increased usage, additional features, and new practice areas without requiring a complete overhaul.

To prioritize value effectively, law firms should adopt a structured approach to software evaluation:

  1. Identify Core Needs and Bottlenecks: Begin by assessing the firm’s current workflow and identifying areas where improved legal research software could provide the most benefit. Are attorneys spending too much time on research? Are there research tasks that monopolize time and resources? Understanding these needs will guide the selection process.
  2. Assess Integration Capabilities: Evaluate how well the software integrates with existing tools and processes. For instance, does the software offer plugins or APIs that connect with your document management system? Can it easily import and export data to other platforms used by the firm?
  3. Evaluate Long-Term Cost Efficiency: While upfront cost is important, consider the total cost of ownership, including maintenance, updates, and potential need for additional features. Software that seems cheaper initially may incur higher costs over time if it requires frequent upgrades or doesn’t scale well with the firm’s growth. We will discuss this further in Habit #3.
  4. Seek Targeted Feedback from Users: Engage attorneys and staff who will use the software daily. Their insights into ease of use, effectiveness, and integration can provide valuable perspectives that might not be apparent during initial evaluations. Stress test the software for legal questions that are core to their practices and develop a process for getting targeted, circumspect, and detailed written feedback rather than general impressions or superficial engagement.
  5. Consider Vendor Support and Training: A software’s value is also determined by the quality of support and training provided by the vendor. Ensure that the vendor offers comprehensive training resources, ongoing support, and a strong track record of customer service.

Prioritizing value is not an isolated habit. Rather, it sets the foundation for the other habits in this post. Understanding the true value of software directly influences how you approach data transparency (Habit 2), how you integrate software within the broader client service strategy (Habit 3), and how you avoid the pitfalls of trading one set of inefficiencies for another (Habit 4). By mastering the concept of value, you ensure that every subsequent decision is grounded in robust strategic thinking.

Reflection and Self-Assessment

Ask yourself and your team the following questions:

- Are we prioritizing immediate cost savings over long-term value?

- How well does our current software align with our firm’s strategic goals?

- Are there hidden costs associated with our current software that we haven’t accounted for?

- How scalable is our current solution? Will it meet our needs as we grow?

By reflecting on these questions, you can better assess whether you are truly prioritizing value in your software purchases and identify areas where adjustments may be necessary.

Habit 2: Prioritize Usage Data Transparency

Information is power and data is its periodic table. When legal research software vendors withhold usage data, they reduce law firm decision makers to alchemists struggling to turn lead into gold.

For law firms, understanding how legal research software is being used can provide invaluable insights into its effectiveness and areas for improvement. Highly effective legal research software buyers prioritize usage data transparency, recognizing that data-driven decisions lead to better outcomes.

Usage data can reveal patterns in how attorneys interact with the software, which features are most utilized, and where bottlenecks or inefficiencies may occur. By selecting software that offers comprehensive and transparent usage data, firms can continuously optimize their processes, enhance productivity, and ensure that the software is delivering the promised value.

The framework for prioritizing data transparency includes:

  • Visibility: The software should provide clear, easily accessible data on how it is used across the firm. This includes usage statistics, feature adoption rates, and user behavior patterns.
  • Interpretability: Data should be presented in a way that is easy to interpret, allowing decision-makers to draw meaningful conclusions. This might involve dashboards, reports, or visual analytics tools that highlight key metrics.
  • Actionability: The goal of gathering data is to take action. Whether it’s identifying underused features, optimizing workflows, or deciding on additional training, the data should lead to concrete steps that improve the software’s effectiveness.

To effectively prioritize usage data transparency, law firms should take the following steps:

  1. Select Software with Robust Analytics Tools: Choose legal research software that includes built-in analytics capabilities. These tools should provide detailed reports on user activity, feature usage, and overall software performance.
  2. Regularly Review Usage Data: Establish a routine for reviewing usage data. This could be monthly or quarterly, depending on the firm’s needs. Look for trends in usage, such as which features are most popular or which teams are most active, to understand how the software is being utilized.
  3. Use Data to Inform Training and Support: If usage data reveals that certain features are underutilized, consider offering additional training to ensure that all users are fully leveraging the software’s capabilities. Conversely, if some features are frequently used but leading to inefficiencies, this might indicate a need for workflow adjustments or additional support.
  4. Optimize Based on Insights: Continuously refine your software usage based on the insights gained from data. This might involve providing user feedback to the vendor, adjusting access levels, or even revisiting the software’s role within the firm.
  5. Communicate Findings with Stakeholders: Share key insights from usage data with partners and other stakeholders. This transparency ensures that everyone is aligned on the software’s value and any steps needed to enhance its effectiveness.

Data transparency is crucial for supporting the other three habits. For example, understanding how software is used can inform decisions about its value (Habit 1), guide its integration into the firm’s broader strategy (Habit 3), and help avoid investing in software that shifts where inefficiencies happen, but don’t meaningfully improve efficiency overall (Habit 4). By leveraging usage data, you create a feedback loop that enhances decision-making across all aspects of legal research processes.

Reflection and Self-Assessment

Consider these questions to evaluate your approach to data transparency:

- Are we currently collecting and analyzing usage data from our legal research software?

- How often do we review and act on the insights gained from this data?

- Are there gaps in the data we’re collecting that need to be addressed?

- How effectively are we using data to inform training, support, and software optimization?

Regular reflection on these points will ensure that your firm remains proactive in its use of data and continues to optimize its legal research software investments.

Habit 3: Treat Legal Research Software as One Piece in a Broader Puzzle of Client Service Excellence

Legal research software is a powerful tool, but it is only one component of a larger strategy aimed at delivering exceptional client service. Drawing inspiration from Steve Jobs' famous analogy of computers as a "bicycle for the mind," we can see that while legal research software amplifies the capabilities of a law firm, it cannot operate in isolation. Effective law firms understand that software must be integrated into a broader vision of client service excellence, where every tool and process works in harmony to achieve the firm’s goals.

Without a strategic vision, even the most advanced legal research software can become just another tool, underappreciated and seldom used. It is essential to have a clear understanding of how a software product fits into the firm’s overall strategy and how it can be leveraged to maximize client satisfaction and business success.

This habit is rooted in the principles of strategic integration and vision-driven technology adoption:

  • Strategic Integration: This principle emphasizes that every piece of technology, including legal research software, should be chosen and implemented with the firm’s broader strategic goals in mind. This requires a holistic view of how the software will interact with other tools, processes, and the overall business strategy.
  • Vision-Driven Technology Adoption: The software should be used in a way that aligns with and supports the firm’s long-term vision. This means that technology decisions should be guided by a clear understanding of the firm’s goals and how the software will help achieve them.

To treat legal research software as part of a broader client service strategy, consider the following steps:

  1. Define Your Vision for Client Service Excellence: Start by clearly articulating your firm’s vision for client service. What does exceptional client service look like for your firm? How does legal research software fit into this vision?
  2. Map Software to Strategic Goals: Once the vision is defined, map the features and capabilities of your legal research software to specific strategic goals. For example, if your goal is to reduce the time spent on research to provide faster client responses, identify how the software’s features can help achieve this.
  3. Foster Collaboration Across Departments: Ensure that all departments, from IT to legal teams, understand how the software fits into the broader strategy. Collaboration across departments will ensure that the software is used to its full potential and that everyone is working towards the same goals.
  4. Regularly Reevaluate the Role of Software: As your firm’s goals evolve, so too should your use of legal research software. Regularly reassess how the software is being used and adjust ensure that it continues to support your vision of client service excellence.
  5. Integrate Feedback into the Strategy: Gather feedback from clients and staff to better understand how the software is impacting client service. Use this feedback to refine both your use of the software and your overall client service strategy.
Without a strategic vision, even the most advanced legal research software can become just another tool, underappreciated and seldom used.

Treating legal research software as part of a broader strategy is closely connected to the other habits. Prioritizing value (Habit 1) ensures that the software contributes effectively to the strategy, while usage data transparency (Habit 2) provides the insights needed to optimize its role. Additionally, avoiding the pitfalls of inefficiency-swapping (Habit 4) ensures that the software enhances, rather than hinders, your strategic goals.

Reflection and Self-Assessment

Ask these helpful questions to ensure your team has the right perspective on the role of software.

- How does our legal research software contribute to our firm’s vision for client service excellence?

- Are we aligning our technology choices with our long-term strategic goals?

- How often do we reassess the role of legal research software in our strategy?

- Are we fostering collaboration across departments to maximize the software’s potential?

Regular self-assessment will help you maintain a strategic focus and ensure that your legal research software continues to play a vital role in achieving client service excellence.

Habit 4: Avoid the Pitfall of New Software, Same Problems

“Meet the new boss, same as the old boss.”

In today’s fast-moving legal tech landscape, it’s easy for law firms to fall into the trap of inefficiency-swapping—where new software solves one problem but inadvertently creates another. After all, law firms are inundated with software solutions promising to revolutionize their operations. Yet, despite these advances, many firms find themselves facing the same old problems, simply repackaged in a different form. The software you choose to streamline legal research must address the root cause of your issues. Highly effective legal research software buyers have a strategic, thoughtful approach to ensure that new tools genuinely solve problems rather than shift them to another area of the business.

To avoid inefficiency-swapping when adopting new software, law firms should root their approach in the following principles:

  • Systems Thinking: View the firm as a cohesive whole rather than a collection of separate practice groups. When evaluating new software, consider how it will interact with all parts of the system to avoid creating inefficiencies in one area while solving problems in another.
  • Change Management: The successful adoption of new software hinges on the firm’s ability to manage change effectively. This principle focuses on anticipating resistance, understanding the human impact of new tools, and ensuring that the transition does not disrupt workflow, thereby avoiding inefficiency-swapping.
  • Risk Management: This principle involves identifying, assessing, and prioritizing risks associated with new software. By conducting a thorough risk assessment, firms can anticipate unintended consequences and develop strategies to mitigate them, ensuring that the software implementation leads to true improvements rather than new challenges.

Here are some practical steps to ensure that your software choices lead to meaningful improvements:

  1. Conduct a Needs Assessment: Before even considering new software, take a comprehensive look at your firm’s current processes. Identify inefficiencies and areas of frustration among your staff. What are the root causes of these issues? This assessment will help you understand what you truly need from a software solution.
  2. Evaluate Software Capabilities Against Specific Needs: Once you’ve identified your needs, evaluate potential software solutions based on their ability to address these specific challenges. Avoid being swayed by flashy features that do not directly contribute to solving your core problems.
  3. Pilot the Software: Strategically leverage a trial to conduct a pilot program with a small team. This allows you to see how the software performs in real-world conditions and whether it genuinely solves the issues it’s intended to.
  4. Monitor and Adjust: After implementation, continuously monitor the software’s impact on your operations and be prepared to adjust through additional training, process changes, or even reconsidering the software choice if it’s not meeting expectations.

Avoiding the trap of inefficiency-swapping (Habit 4) is deeply connected to the other habits. By prioritizing value (Habit 1), law firms ensure that software solutions are selected based on their ability to address strategic needs effectively, rather than merely adding complexity. Prioritizing usage data transparency (Habit 2) provides critical insights into how software is performing and where it may be creating new inefficiencies, allowing for timely adjustments. Additionally, treating legal research software as part of a broader client service strategy (Habit 3) integrates it into the overall workflow, ensuring that it enhances rather than disrupts the firm’s strategic objectives. Each habit reinforces the others, creating a comprehensive approach to technology adoption that minimizes the risk of inefficiency-swapping.

Reflection and Self-Assessment

Guard against inefficiency-swapping with these questions:

- Have we conducted a thorough needs assessment before adopting new software?

- Do we evaluate software solutions based on their ability to address our specific challenges, or are we swayed by trends and superficial benefits?

- How do we ensure that the software genuinely improves our processes rather than shifting problems elsewhere?

- Are we monitoring the impact of new software post-implementation to ensure it delivers the intended benefits?

By reflecting on these questions, your firm can better identify areas where your approach to technology might need adjustment, ensuring that future software choices are genuinely beneficial.

Conclusion

Adopting these four habits – prioritizing value, urging data transparency, integrating software into a broader strategy, and avoiding inefficiency-swapping – will equip your firm with the tools it needs to make highly effective legal research software purchases. These habits not only ensure that you select the best software for your needs but also that you maximize its potential to drive client service excellence and long-term success.

By viewing legal research software not as a mere expense but as a strategic investment, and by adopting a thoughtful, data-driven approach to its selection and integration, your firm can enhance its capabilities, streamline processes, and ultimately deliver greater value to your clients.

Remember, the most effective law firms are those that leverage technology to amplify their strengths, address their weaknesses, and achieve their strategic goals. With these habits in mind, you’re poised to consistently make strategic software buying decisions that benefit your firm and your clients alike.

TM

Before talking to an expert, tell us
what would need to happen for you to view
our meeting as successful

As a member of
*
, reachable at
*
,
*
I would like to learn more about Autojot's platform.
Other than me,
,
+
needs to be present to weigh in.
and
,
and
,
and
,
and
,
and
,
It would be important for us to know how Autojot adds value in terms of
*
Given recent developments at the firm, during our meeting, we’d need to focus on
*
We’d have to figure out if it’s feasible to have Autojot in place by next
*
  • Week
  • Month
  • Quarter
  • Half
  • Year
What else would make us successful?
*
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Please make sure, that required fields are filled and email is valid.
Next

Piece together the puzzle
and unlock the future of your legal practice!

[firm name]
Calendar